Please also remember that all of the following (course syllabus, p.8) are considered plagiarism:

This is a written summery of a research article. I have attached the article as well as the written summery of the article.The written summery paper needs to be edited acording to the standards listed below. I am enclosing an email from the professor. I need help and assistance with this. It is very important… Continue reading Please also remember that all of the following (course syllabus, p.8) are considered plagiarism:

Explain your position.

Read the selection from the Natural Sciences. Then, compose a paragraph discussing the theme. Explain your position.

You will use the research question you revised in the previous module to write a hypothesis.

Science starts with a question, which is then transformed into a hypothesis that can be tested. This is how scientific knowledge is created. In this activity, you will write your own hypothesis that relates to your finalized research question. Prompt Use the provided Module Four Activity Template Word Document to complete this assignment. You will… Continue reading You will use the research question you revised in the previous module to write a hypothesis.

What does this individual study?

Find an example of an atypical evolutionary biologist, a scientist that has identities other than the stereotypical scientist (older white males, e.g., Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, Richard Dawkins) and use the following questions as a guide for your assignment: Who is this person? What does this individual study? What makes this person counter stereotypical? What… Continue reading What does this individual study?

I’ve uploaded the critique guidelnes, rubric, and example papers.

The Critique is based off a research paper: https://royalsocietypublishing-org.proxy.library.emory.edu/doi/10.1098/rspb.2021.1997 The paper should be 3-3.5 pages long (no more than that). The reference list doesn’t count towards the page requirement. The citation should be in the Journal of Neuroscience format, including the reference list. The paper is worth 20% of my final grede so PLEASE follow… Continue reading I’ve uploaded the critique guidelnes, rubric, and example papers.

What challenges did you encounter in trying to analyze a scientific source?

This module’s webtext focused on researching your issue in the natural sciences and evaluating different sources. In your initial post, explain what the biggest challenge you faced was when trying to find sources? What challenges did you encounter in trying to analyze a scientific source? How did you overcome them? Use specific examples in your… Continue reading What challenges did you encounter in trying to analyze a scientific source?

Stated perspective and position on the issue (15 pts)

See handout and video for detailed instructions. The handout describes the assignment in detail. The Video describes the essence of the assignment, hopefully lessening any fears you might have about writing. Video Link: https://vimeo.com/osu/review/286948538/1120ed0714 (Links to an external site.) Instructions for Essay: Historical Recipe vs. Modern Brewing Practice Due date: This assignment is published in… Continue reading Stated perspective and position on the issue (15 pts)

In your initial post, explain what the biggest challenge you faced was when trying to find sources?

This module’s webtext focused on researching your issue in the natural sciences and evaluating different sources. In your initial post, explain what the biggest challenge you faced was when trying to find sources? What challenges did you encounter in trying to analyze a scientific source? How did you overcome them? Use specific examples in your… Continue reading In your initial post, explain what the biggest challenge you faced was when trying to find sources?

Example of a well-written discussion post. 1. General thoughts. I really liked

Example of a well-written discussion post. 1. General thoughts. I really liked this paper because it opened my eyes to an aspect of biology that I had never known before. Blah, blah, blah. 2. Comments from the related literature. Jones et al. (2020) reported similar results and extended those from the assigned paper. Specifically, they… Continue reading Example of a well-written discussion post.
1. General thoughts. I really liked

RESEARCH PAPER GRADING CRITERIA POINTS CRITERIA CONTENT 75 EXCELLENT TO VERY GO

RESEARCH PAPER GRADING CRITERIA POINTS CRITERIA CONTENT 75 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: informative – appropriate to topic – substantive – relevant to topic – includes all the following information: Vital information to include: Cause of disease Course of disease Treatments available (if any) Therapeutic management Prognosis Avoidance/Prevention How does this disease affect you as an… Continue reading RESEARCH PAPER GRADING CRITERIA
POINTS CRITERIA
CONTENT
75 EXCELLENT TO VERY GO